Does pure neure supplement work? What has the media said in the past?
what do Youtube comments say?
@jeffb5785
10 If Carson was a Democrat, CNN would promote this company or ignore the story totally
@stedmans4christ
54 Now, I want to try this product, especially since “the scientific community/pharma industry” does not approve of it.
@pjjp6341
há 2 anosI’ll endorse the product! I was getting sick and couldn’t get over it, i got well! My immune system is always strong now! Yes it’s expensive. Mr. Carson had a relationship but, it’s just that! I’d believe Mr Carson over all the other interviews and interviewers, combined. You know how it works! The medical industry hides the successful products, look to what extent they hid the success of Cannabis! Even the wild animals sought out that plant when they were sick. Our FDA/CDC have an agenda.
@marthalattimore4168
há 2 anosI have to say that I’m am in awe of “NoMoreTears” comment because I just “semi- listened” to the doubtful news person and just like …you decided that I will now try this product because I try think that it has to be good following the negative press!!! I just noticed that all of this was 2 years ago but better late than never!!!
@pjjp6341
há 2 anosSee link above
@DANA-pp4cg
2 Exactly! People are brain washed.
@pugachevskobra5636
5 Hmm yes! The scientific/ pharma/ gubmint has also decried drinking cat piss 110 octane racing fuel cocktails so I think I’m gonna order gallons of it!!
@marcushenning3594
há 2 anosSo basically, he endorses vitamins, and because it turns out it doesn’t cure cancer and down syndrome, he is the bad guy? What’s wrong with the media?
@mjt11860
24 “…the scientific community was calling worthless”. did they call it worthless or didn’t they say there were no studies to support their claims? 2 VERY DIFFERENT STATEMENTS.
@michaelmashiri4818
1 They will do anything to get this guy down.
@christopherpace3864
4 assinantesJournalists trying to understand the mind of a neuro surgeon
. Now let’s ask pro athletes players about their view on science. I’m sure it will be ground breaking
Unveiling the Controversy: Dr. Ben Carson’s Ties with Mannatech
In a recent surge of media scrutiny, Dr. Ben Carson, the renowned neurosurgeon turned presidential candidate, has found himself at the center of a contentious debate.
The bone of contention? His alleged association with Mannatech, a nutritional supplement company.
Carson’s vehement denial of any substantial relationship with the company during a Republican debate has sparked a deeper investigation into the nature of his involvement, raising questions about the integrity of his claims and the product in question.
The Mannatech Saga: A Decade-Long Association?
Dr. Ben Carson’s connection with Mannatech dates back nearly a decade, beginning in 2004 and continuing until 2013. During this period, Carson delivered four paid speeches at Mannatech events and appeared in promotional materials, including videos that were used by the company’s associates. Despite his assertions to the contrary, these facts suggest a relationship that goes beyond casual or incidental. The company’s sales associates even underwrote a public television special featuring Carson, further blurring the lines between endorsement and personal use.
The Product at the Heart of the Debate
Mannatech’s flagship product, a dietary supplement boasting a blend of tree bark, aloe gum, and other ingredients, claims to support better health through the science of glyconutrients—a term that has been met with skepticism from the scientific community. The Texas Attorney General sued Mannatech in 2007 for exaggerating the health benefits of their products, which were purported to treat serious illnesses like Down syndrome and cancer. The lawsuit, which Mannatech settled for $7 million without admitting wrongdoing, labeled the company’s claims as a sham, casting a shadow over the products Carson has publicly praised.
Carson’s Defense: A Personal Choice or a Professional Endorsement?
When confronted with evidence of his association with Mannatech, Dr. Carson has consistently downplayed his involvement, stating that he was contracted for speeches and did not officially endorse the products. He maintains that his personal use of the supplements, which he credits for his good health, should not be conflated with a professional endorsement. However, his presence in promotional materials and the use of his image on the company’s website have raised eyebrows, leading to a demand for clarity on the nature of his relationship with Mannatech.
The Implications of a Presidential Candidate’s Endorsements
The controversy surrounding Dr. Ben Carson’s involvement with Mannatech goes beyond the question of whether he endorsed a product. It touches on the broader issue of the responsibilities that come with being a public figure, particularly one with a prestigious medical background. The expectation is that such individuals will adhere to evidence-based practices and not lend their credibility to unproven products. The unfolding story serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability in the public arena, especially when one’s actions have the potential to influence public opinion and consumer behavior.
Conclusion: The Verdict on Carson’s Mannatech Connection
As the media continues to delve into Dr. Ben Carson’s past and his ties with Mannatech, the public is left to sift through the facts and determine the significance of this relationship. While Carson stands by his personal use of the supplements and denies any formal endorsement, the revelations about his involvement with the company have undoubtedly added a layer of complexity to his presidential campaign. It is a situation that calls for discernment and critical evaluation, as voters consider the values and judgment of those vying for the highest office in the land.
